Just another UNEPortfolios site

Author: phussey (Page 4 of 6)

QCQ #3 Jane Eyre

Quote: “But I feel this, Helen: I must dislike those who, whatever I do to please them, persist in disliking me; I must resist those who punish me unjustly. It is as natural as that I should love those who show me affection, or submit to punishment when I feel it is deserved.” (page 119)

Comment: Throughout the book, Jane had been mistreated everywhere that she lived but all of the people who mistreated her were “in charge”. Jane had to endure what Mrs. Reed and her awful children did to her and then dealt with teachers and Mr.Brocklehurst at Lowood. All of the people that punished Jane seemed to do so for no reason. Jane was tormented by Mrs.Reed and her children for doing absolutely nothing and then punished at Lowood for accidentally breaking a plate. Jane may have dealt with bad people where she lived, but she also had kind people trying to look after her. At the house, she had Bessie who tried to treat Jane better than the rest in the house. I think at the time Jane thought that everyone was trying to belittle her. Only at the end when Jane was leaving for Lowood did she realize that Bessie cared about her. At Lowood, she had Miss Temple who was extremely kind to her and tried to look after her every chance that she got. I agree with Jane saying that people who treat others badly should be treated badly in return and those who treat others kindly should receive the same attitude back. Jane did stand up to Mrs. Reed who backed down and seemed to agree with Jane’s argument. When Jane was publicly shamed in front of her classmates at Lowood she did not stand up for herself because maybe she thought that she deserved the punishment for breaking the plate. Jane seems like a kind and smart girl and endured more then he should of.

Question: Was Jane treated so poorly because she was knowledgable and continued to strive to learn more? Did people resent her because of her knowledge and at such a young age?

Commonplace Book Entry #2

Trans-lating the Monster: Transgender Affect and Frankenstein

“Synthetic products” of a “medical empire”

“my lifelong belief that, as a transsexual, I was a monster”

Frankenstein in the automatic factory

“Frankenstein explores a profound tension that was begging to emerge in industrial society between biology and technology, physiology and mechanics”

Born This Way: Reading Frankenstein with Disability

“The scenes of his birth, recounted by Victor, dramatize an unsatisfactory parental response to the birth of a disabled child”

QCQ #2

“For while I destroyed his hopes, I did not satisfy my own desires. They were for ever ardent and craving; still I desired love and fellowship, and I was still spurned. Was there no injustice in this? Am I to be thought the only criminal, when all human kind sinned against me?”

Comment: The creature seemed to desire what anyone desires, love, friendship, and compassion. When he first ran away from Victor he had to learn everything from the beginning alone but whenever he saw anyone they instantly rejected him because of his appearance. It would have been understandable if the creature killed anyone that treated him poorly, but he didn’t. In the end, the creature, even having killed all of the people closest to Victor, seemed to me to be the victim. Victor created the creature and then abandoned him, of course, the creature would develop some sort of anger towards that.

Question: If the creature was so upset about how the people reacted to him anytime they came in contact, why did he not kill everyone that treated him poorly?

Commonplace book entry #1

“The figure passed me quickly, and I lost it in the gloom. Nothing in human shape could have destroyed that fair child. He was the murderer! I could not doubt it. The mere presence of the idea was an irresistible proof of the fact.” (Shelley, page 75)

Having Victor spend so much time creating Frankenstein, so much time in fact that he was sleep-deprived and lost contact with his family makes it seem strange that he was so quick to accuse Frankenstein of killing his brother. Could it have been that Victor felt so guilty about what he had created that he felt it necessary to do anything to be rid of it? Not only guilty but fearful of the creature. Victor maybe blames himself for some of this but wants to lay most of the fault on his creation. It would make sense that he did not want to be blamed because if he was ok with the thought of being blamed then he would have not allowed Justine to die for something that he was so sure that she did not do.

QCQ #1

I think one of the biggest misconceptions about monsters is what makes someone or something a monster. Many think that anyone who looks abnormal or doesn’t act normal is a monster. But this is a bad way to identify who is and isn’t a monster. Cohen’s 4th thesis is “The Monster Dwells at the Gates of Difference” (Cohen, 7) which talks about this very point. People are extremely quick to judge what makes someone a monster and one of the biggest reasons is due to the first thing we typically judge on is appearance. Not only is it the first thing typically judged but it is the first thing that we see when we meet someone new.

Cohen talks about a man named Richard from the Renaissance time who used to transform from monster to man by raising his arm to look deformed (9). This showed that people judged him and called him a monster only when he looked, unlike others. Another example of this is when Cohen talked about people in Africa with black skin. “Dark skin was associated with the fires of hell” (Cohen, 10). People believed that because their skin was black it signified hell and people with dark skin must have come from there. This is another visual trait that caused many to judge another based on appearance.

Another factor contributing to the idea of someone being a monster is how they act but this can be affected by how they are treated. In modern movies, creatures do not start out wanting to destroy cities or kill people but after armies come in and try to kill the creature, only then do they typically become violent and destructive. Something is not built to be dangerous but becomes that after being mutually hated and feared. Frankenstein is another example of something that turned into a monster because of how people reacted. I remember movies with Frankenstein and how he did not like fire and when someone had a torch he would become scared and violent.

Being able to tell if someone is truly a monster puts minds at ease because we can stay clear of people ho could cause us harm, but when people found out that someone could be a monster and not look like one becomes scarier. I believe this is why people only wanted to call people who looked different monsters, because we could see it with our eyes. Knowing there are people who are as evil as some look but we are unable to tell is terrifying. This still does not give us the right to judge someone or call someone a monster just by there appearance.

Question Essay #2

Why are we not doing anything to stop climate change when we know it is an issue?

We wonder why when a problem presents itself, why do some brush it under the rug? Could it be some are too stubborn to change? Or something as simple as laziness? We know that climate change exists and there is plenty of data to support that.  A lot of people hear statistics with a lot of numbers and shut down at that point. Then there are people, me for example, who actually have there minds changed from hearing the numbers. Others see movements and have there minds changed.  But some just think it is too big for anything to change and too big for one person. Bill Mckibben is an environmental activist and he supports this by saying, “There’s always stuff to be done and more of it all the time and that’s what movements look like.” (22:16) We have to start somewhere and when we do, that is when things can change. If we don’t believe that climate change is right then we have to do something. In the book If Your House Is On Fire written by Kathleen Dean Moore, she states “If the culture forces us to live in ways we don’t believe in, then we have to change the culture.” (6) We know there is an issue and spreading the word in any way shape or form can help.

Climate Change (Naysayer)

When we hear of something that is destroying our planet it is alarming, but when we hear that it was caused by us, it’s sad. Climate change has been affecting our planet for generations and continues to get worse. Many experts have confirmed this and KNOW that eventually, it will become irreversible. Bill McKibben states in his movie Do The Math“We’re no longer at the point of trying to stop global warming, too late for that. We’re at the point of trying to keep it from becoming complete and utter calamity.” (6:31) But how can we stop this? It is hard to make a memorable and worth wild change but not doing anything is worse. Most know the issue and try to change small things through the day. Things such as avoiding plastic and other non-biodegradable items and more people are trying to recycle.

NAYSAYER

There are some who say doing those things are useless. Not using plastic straws is so small, it isn’t going to change much. Some believe that climate change will not get to the point of unsustainable living. Even with the small changes that we can do on a daily bases, they believe that it is not worth it and a waste of time. Even the skeptics cant argue with science and confirmed figures.  In Do The Math Bill McKibben talks about the question NASA answered which was how much carbon is too much to be in the atmosphere. They found that anything greater then 350 ppm is not sustanible for human development. Scientist say that today the atmosphere is 395 ppm and its rising 2 ppm every year (8:20). It is next to impossible to argue when NASA and scientist are involved. This would give anyone the information and answers that they need to prove their doubts.

If Your House Is On Fire- Kathleen Dean Moore

Climate change has been a controversy for centuries and continues to be a problem, but it continues to be an issue. Why does something continue to happen if we know its a problem? Kathleen Dean Moore talks about the moral urgency of climate change. On big concern is the fact that many think we are too small to do something big. Moore heard a very strong argument against that when she heard Desmond Tutu. He gave an example about how this is incorrect; the thought that we are too small to make a change, “He knows from experience that it is possible to bring down entrenched institutions.” (3) We see from that even with that thought that it is impossible to bring down these corporations who have been part of climate change, that we do in fact have power. One big influence is a person’s morals. Morals are what tells us what we are doing is wrong.  Moore believes that moral arguments are the best appeal (8). She goes on to give three reasons why moral arguments are prominent. On example she gives is “Moral arguments speak to all people. Economic arguments speak only to a few.” This shows that even being small, we are still able to do something about these global concerns. Do we not have a moral obligation to face climate change? (2)

Barclay’s Formula

Change is hard to accomplish. When we see a problem in society and want to change it, it takes time and connections. In the movie Do the Math by Bill Mckibben, he talks about the effects that fossil fuel industries and the effects fossil fuel has on our environment. He also expresses the challenges that we face trying to end this crisis and how to begin to start this progress of change. McKibben states “My theory of change was I’ll write my book, people will read it and then they’ll change but that’s not how change happens.” (0:40) He expresses that he thought writing his book would get things going but in fact, it was much more difficult and complex than that. A movement doesn’t happen overnight. In comparison, in Charles Duhigg’s book The Power of Habit he talks about how change is done from our strong and weak ties. Our strong ties are people that we are close to and weak ties are acquaintances.  Both of these people are important to get a movement started. Duhigg explains that ” A movement starts because of the social habits of friendship and the strong ties between close acquaintances.” (87) We can not start a movement with only our close friends. No one has enough friends to start any type of movement large enough to make a big change. Duhigg understands that we need people to make a change. Both Duhigg and McKibben talk about the same ideas and how we all want to get to the same endpoint, peace.  We can’t have peace without starting somewhere and we can’t have peace without connections. With both of these things, we can reach our end goal.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 Paige's Site

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

css.php